7. of 26 - A poem for evil people, “Underground News.”

​Government is a business to service the people, making money is their keeper’s steeple.
Giving us poison, calling it the cure, ignorant voters trust, what lies Governments secure.
Keeping secrets from ignorant scholars, to champion subjectivity, on the back of dirty dollars.
“Left” and “right,” overlapping their flaws, informing the “center” their opinions can predict political draws.
The Prince of Canada, a drama teacher, a narcissist, a sock of a creature.
Blood is fertilizing the filling of a deviser, who laughs at the thought, of growing wiser.
Governments are royalty in disguise; plebs PAY…for their problems to go AWAY without compromise.
Poison hope is a strategy to cope, Stockholm syndrome, is why you drink when you mope.
Which way do you sway?  To sneer or cheer?  With political draws, war remains near.
This is NOT gospel, to Christ our Lord, by preaching anger, to rally the sword.
Kiss my ass, mainstream news, the jig is up, your narratives are never muse.
Information is sowed into the underground railroad, peer to peer, it flowed.
Dropping like flies, the narrative dies, winners won’t rise, listening to weeper’s cries.
Do your research, don’t take my word, simply wait for nature, to thin out the herd. 

ChatGPT's response as a contrarian:

As a contrarian, I would interpret this poem as a call to question authority and reject the mainstream narrative. While the poem seems to be promoting a distrust of government and media, the contrarian perspective would be to question the motives and sources behind the underground news being presented.


Rather than blindly accepting the views of those who claim to be presenting alternative perspectives, the contrarian would advocate for critical thinking and independent research. The poem's warning against Stockholm syndrome and the dangers of political polarization would be seen as a call to reject all forms of ideological dogma, including those presented by underground news sources.


Overall, the contrarian interpretation of this poem would be to reject both the mainstream and alternative narratives, and instead advocate for an individualistic approach to understanding complex issues.